tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7844526396210378482.post7776328193730684313..comments2024-01-31T09:23:26.925+00:00Comments on Noel O'Blog: Name that stereochemistryNoel O'Boylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03288289351940689018noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7844526396210378482.post-2419743581009693602010-12-07T13:21:14.666+00:002010-12-07T13:21:14.666+00:00This representation would probably cost a point or...This representation would probably cost a point or two on an undergraduate exam. I don't think any formalism, however internally correct, would make it palatable to a practicing chemist.Orionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00412216321696123699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7844526396210378482.post-1607240202893577032010-12-07T09:10:31.769+00:002010-12-07T09:10:31.769+00:00That's exactly the issue. The image is a faith...That's exactly the issue. The image is a faithful reproduction of the underlying MOL file, but 2D mol files are not very useful without knowing the wedge bond convention adopted. I'll expand in a further blog post.Noel O'Boylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03288289351940689018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7844526396210378482.post-87804436934824931282010-12-06T20:19:10.153+00:002010-12-06T20:19:10.153+00:00Which wedge bond formalism are you using here agai...Which wedge bond formalism are you using here again?Egon Willighagenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07470952136305035540noreply@blogger.com