What went well:
- Great talks, and good participation from the audience in questions.
- We had a couple of first-time ACS speakers. I thought about standing up at the start and trying to settle their nerves by telling them I was a first-time organiser, but that might have made things worse. :-)
- Having a keynote speaker was a great idea. I especially liked the idea of having a keynote speaker with broader experience outside the main topic of the symposium, the reason being that this is sometimes one of the best ways of bringing new ideas into a field. Elizabeth Dorland (Washington Uni) kicked things off to a great start with a look at Chemistry Visualization in Education.
- High attendance. This is a reflection on the quality of the speakers of course.
- I think the symposium was reasonably well advertised on the CCL, my blog, and CHMINF-L. Apart from the keynote, none of the speakers were invited and yet we received quite a number of talks.
What could have been done better:
- The talks were 20min + 5min for questions. At the 15min mark, we indicated that 5 mins were left. Afterwards, one of the presenters told us that he understood that the signal indicated the 20min mark and so brought things to a premature end. Given that all the talks ended with plenty of time for questions, he may not have been the only person we confused. Next time, we should explain the hand signals in advance.
- Bring a functioning timepiece and a pointer next time. Apparently, my phone charger doesn't work in the US and my watch is broken. A pointer was provided by the ACS on Day Two, but we lacked one on Day One (I should have asked the meeting technicians).
- We also had some problems following up on sponsorship which I won't discuss further here.
What was unexpected:
- Exactly how the recording worked. Many talks were recorded, in which case the desktop PC provided needed to be used to enable the powerpoint timing to be captured.
- The inability to log into the PACS system after the symposium was finalised. This made it difficult to get the speakers email addresses and abstracts. Fortunately, I had printed out (as PDF) some of the details earlier.
- The fact that apart from one or two exceptions, almost everyone submits their abstracts in the last week before the deadline. This is somewhat understandable as it's still 6 months before the conference at that stage.
- The time required for the ACS to communicate to authors that their papers were accepted.
- Some of these talks were recorded and will be up on the web soon. In the meanwhile, you can find some on Slideshare, such as that by Jean-Claude and Andy.
- If you have an idea for a symposium or are simply interested in helping to organise one (good for CV, etc.), I know that Rajarshi is very happy to hear from you..
Finally, I'd like to thank Rajarshi publicly for all of his help in organising this symposium. Considering that this was only one of several symposia in the CINF division he really does a huge amount behind the scenes keeping things going.