The following examples investigate this notation. The stereotypical examples are the following:
A. C[C@](Br)(Cl)I - ACW(C,Br,Cl,I)where ACW(w,x,y,z) indicates anticlockwise in terms of x,y,z when looking from w. However, note that the first group does not necessarily need to appear before the chiral carbon:
B. C[C@H](Br)I - ACW(C,H,Br,I)
C. [C@](C)(Br)(Cl)I - ACW(C,Br,Cl,I) (Same as A)
D. [C@H](C)(Br)I - ACW(H,C,Br,I) (Opposite of B)
What about ring closures? These are handled as followed:
E. C[C@H]1CCN1 -
ACW(C,H,N,C) (the 1 indicates a bond to the chiral C)
F. C[C@]12N(CC2)C1 -
ACW(C, the C1 carbon, the C2 carbon, N)
G. C[C@@]21N(CC2)C1 -
CW(C, the C2 carbon, the C1 carbon, N) (the same as F)
Note that ring closures directly before an atom do not indicate a bond to that atom. Try to draw the following and compare your result to that given by Daylight's Depict service:
H. [C@@]123[C@H](C(C=C3)(C)C)CC[C@@](C1)(CCC2)CIf you got that right, consider yourself a SMILES ninja.
Credit: Thanks to Craig James for his patient explanations.
Image credit: sean-b